cum Apple historia est maxime utile in comitatu septimana, vix eorum animos analysts.
"Vestibulum", "Palmarium", Per "draconem" coniectoribus quidam, quemadmodum fecerat numeros $ 18bn firma ostendens Silius (£ 12bn) tribus duntaxat mensibus - vendendo 34,000 iPhones hora circa horologium ex October ad May. Habet pecuniam in ripa 178bn nunc $.
Sed omnis motus, et coepit interrogare. Qui enim a societate ripam minus conturbauit 20 annis ago, Quamdiu evangelii permaneat? Lorem corporatum mundi maxima sex quaestionibus, quae res magnum.
financially, hoc est, ad apicem?
Apple erat 90 Steve Jobs cum aucto in dies ab conturbauit ut post patuit, 1997- - Lacus autem modo se habet ad res oeconomicas LEVO et ante quatuor in ordine ad opprimendum elit et utile Forum analysts.
Hic est fructus et in parte altera lance, quamquam. Sales sunt in tres menses superessent usque ad finem Decembris 30% ut 74.6bn $. Qui fructum ejus sursum of $ 18bn 37%.
Erat autem cum ieiunas crescit March Review 2012, sed nunc de magnitudine dimidii Apple. Et Apple scriptor principes oeconomicis minister, Luca Maestri, dixit: "Non enim magnitudine parum comitatus nostri feat."
Michael Huberty, a Morgan Stanley Analyticum, dictum est "in quartam litteras" target participes pretium a et auxit $126 ad $133, significat quod non credit, is magis ad profectum venerunt. portiones, quem misit 5% et in negotiatione post-horas eventus sequens Apple, claudantur, $117 on Friday.
Magnus challenge nunc, says Geoffrey Blaber, Vice-Praeses ipsum ad CCS Insight, altera est augmentum occasionem invenire. "Europa et America Septentrionali subinde fiunt: locus est augmentum de Apple est ad confidunt in a augmentum accipere [Google] Ratio ex Android fabrica," dicit. "Magnum, magnum, minus focus in Sinis et India. "
Thomson Reuters tondere per analysts sperare in reditus anno ad November crescere Apple 22%, sed incrementum est tardus ad 4% in sequenti anno,.
Sunt plures qui volunt iPhone populus?
A record in parte 74.5m Mobiles veniit Apple, 46% eodem anno ante quam in. "Press for iPhone est titubante, discussurus nostra expectatione,"Summum exsecutiva Tim Cook dixit:. "Hoc volumen facile comprehendimus."
Lacus risus commodo et pro parte dimidia et sextante, et plus quam Microsoft scriptor latest Quarterly sales simul et Google.
"Videtur totus mundus vult iPhone,"Marcus Milunovich, an Analyticum UBS, in elit ut nota scripsit, Lacus risus sed etiam consumerent poposcisset docens eos non posset satis nuper.
Autem, Toni Sacconaghi, Analyticum Bernstein et ipsum, Apple potest esse augmentum cautos fidens in productum linea septem annorum. "Bet Apple iPhone, est magis a bet,"Inquit Sacconaghi. "Bonum nuntium est,, iPhones sunt,. Et malum est,, Nunc ut 'aurigabat super 100% reditus incrementum dolor. "
Quam maximus est Sinis?
Ipsum: Sales in in iPhone et exploding agro. Apple comprehendit loci ad Sinis scriptor maxima productorem Xiaomi in ultima parte auctor felis. Chinese Sales, quod infirmum fuerat pro Apple, usque ad latest dimisit eam grandior screen phone,, venit in 16.1bn at $, autem 70% in anno - ut accessum daret Sinis et non multa 'existimavit Mobile 760 decies Signatores.
Revenues in China are quickly catching up with the amount it collects in the whole of Europe, where sales were $17.2bn, autem 20%.
“I was there [in China] right after the launch in October, and the excitement around the iPhone 6 atque 6 More [erat] absolutely phenomenal,” Cook said during his call with analysts. “You can tell that we’re a big believer in China.”
Apple plans to double the number of its stores in greater China to 40 by mid-2016. “It’s an incredible market,"Inquit,. “People love Apple products. And we are going to do our best to serve the market.”
Only a year earlier, in October 2013, Apple was the No 6 smartphone maker in China, trailing Xiaomi, Huawei, Lenovo, Samsung and Yulong, according to research firm Canalys.
“This is an amazing result, given that the average selling price of Apple’s handsets is nearly double those of its nearest competitors,” Canalys says. “While Chinese smartphone vendors are quickly gaining ground internationally, Apple has turned the tables on them in their home market.”
Can it afford for the Apple Watch to fail?
It has been five years since Apple launched its latest truly new product – the iPad – in 2010. To live up to its name for innovation, and diversify revenues away from reliance on the iPhone, Apple needs the Apple Watch to be an unqualified success.
Cook announced that the watch would go on sale in April, giving the company a boost in its third quarter when it will not benefit from Christmas or the Chinese new year, which will have helped the previous two quarters. “We’re making great progress in the development of it,"Inquit,.
Apple describes the new product – often referred to as the iWatch, although it has not been officially named – as the “most personal device ever” and it is thought it will be able to monitor its wearer’s health as well as connect to an iPhone to provide several other functions. Cook said app developers had already impressed him with “some incredible innovation”.
Carolina Milanesi at Kantar Worldpanel ComTech says the watch will help Apple extend its sales into a much wider market. “They have been very smart in pushing it as jewellery and design rather than how technologically smart it is,” she says. “They are concentrating more on impressing the design and fashion world than the tech bloggers.
“I think this will be a much more irrational buy than with an iPad. With an iPad you wanted an iPad: this is going to be more of a fashion statement.”
She said the launch would benefit from the fashion and marketing skills of Angela Ahrendts, the former Burberry boss Apple hired last year on a $73m pay package as its head of retail.
Apple poached a string of big names from fashion and design to join its watch team, including Patrick Pruniaux, former vice-president of sales at Tag Heuer and former Yves Saint Laurent boss Paul Deneve, who is now Apple’s “vice president of special projects”.
Has Tim Cook emerged from the shadow of Steve Jobs?
Few chief executives were as intimately connected to their companies as Jobs was with Apple, and Cook faced a tough battle to win over investors who feared he lacked the co-founder’s vision and showmanship.
Activist investors David Einhorn and Carl Icahn have tried to interfere with Cook’s management, but he has stood his ground. He’s also shown his steely side by axing Scott Forstall, the former head of its iOS mobile operating system, over the failed launch of the Apple Maps app, as well as replacing the head of the company’s stores, John Browett – the former Dixons boss – after less than a year in the job.
Jobs and Cook are “such different personalities”, says Milanesi, who has followed Apple for more than a decade. “The reception under Cook has been very positive: he is very impressive in operations and managing the product chain.”
Milanesi says Cook has also done a lot to make Apple feel like a more approachable brand. “With Jobs it was aspirational but somewhat untouchable and distant,” she says. “It seems much more open and accessible under Tim, and that’s important as they want to extend the product range to a wide section of consumers.
“His big test will be the Apple Watch, as it’s the first product to be launched under his leadership.”
Will Apple’s huge cash pile become a liability?
Apple is making much more money than it can spend, to the extent that it has built up a $178bn cash pile. It added $23bn to the coffers in the last quarter and nearly all of it is banked overseas. Taking it back to the US to return it to shareholders would incur a big tax bill.
To appease investors Apple has been buying back shares, but by borrowing against the cash rather than using the capital. It bought back $45bn of shares last year but hasn’t made much of a dent in the cash. It has $35bn of debt.
Blaber says Apple needs to maintain a large surplus to give it “the muscle and flexibility to invest in new categories”. But its latest and biggest acquisition – Dr Dre’s headphones and streaming business Beats Electronics – cost it $3bn.
The size of Apple’s cash holding has attracted the attention of politicians. Cook has told Congress the company will eventually bring it back onshore, but only when there is a “dramatic simplification of the corporate tax code” including a “reasonable tax on foreign earnings that allows the free flow of capital back to the US”.
Custos guardian.co.uk © News & Media Limited 2010